LET US ALL BECOME NOBLE-RIGHTEOUS-HONORABLE, in one word, AN ARYA, आर्यः

Sanskrit word 'arya' 'is an adjective that stands for nobleness, righteousness, honorable etc put together, as a quality of an arya person. Applied in its noun form, an 'Aryah' (आर्यः) indicates a noble-rightoeus- honorable person. It was never a race signifying word as what seems to have come to mean today. But the errorneous interpretations made in those days of limited knowledge and limited technology divided people on Aryan-Dravidian-indegenous etc imaginative and unexisting 'races'. AIT has been proved completely wrong and so the racial existence of 'Aryan, or "Dravidian" or "Indegenous" races in India. There is no special DNA or gene marker indicative of a race-separation among India's so called indegenous, southern or northern Indians. Essentially the suffix "n" in the commonly employed term "Aryan", is technically an error. It can just be 'Arya' in English or in Sanskrit, 'आर्यः' Let us implore everyone to become noble individuals, the Arya or an Aryah. Everyone, whatever your faith be, say Christians, Muslims, Hindus, Jews or atheism, whatever be your political beliefs, communists, socialist, royalist or capitalists, whatever be your status, rich or poor, clever or dumb, weak, meek or bully, everone can evolve, can become Noble or say Arya. In the current 'identity' driven divided society and in the heightened 'Oppressor-Oppressed' divide, the wisdom of this ancient tradition is a ray of hope for the world. In one word, that ancient wisom, that ancient tradition is called "Hinduism". Hinduism means, "Include-everyone", Respect all Beliefs", "Other is not other". "World is one family" "Let Everyone be happy and Healthy", Hinduism knew from the time immemorial, how to celebrate individuality of each person and each group. Idea behind this blog is to bring out those ancient ideas, bring out innate goodness and potentials by highlighting various known and unknown facts from within the ancient land of India. He has special facination for the erstwhile but now nearly extinct Pagan communities of the world. He feels connected with them on account of shared importance they both attach to nature-worship.

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

"VARNA-MALA" Sequencing of Alphabets in Sanskrit and rest of the South Asian Languages. A logical sequence


European Alphabets, traditionally follow sequence from A to Z. Similarly, in Indian languages, it is from to ज्ञ. However the main difference being presence of logical sequencing of order. Indian अक्षर sequenced in a logical, speech-pattern order. This manner of arrangement of Indian ‘Akshar’ (अक्षर) is known as ‘Varna-Mala’ (वर्णमाला).

Sanskrit ‘varna-maala’ is shown below. The first line represents vowels and rest of the lines, consonants.

Indian alphabets are not sequenced arbitrarily but are grouped together based on the science of speech. Consonants are grouped in according to the usage and position of the tongue during their pronunciation. Those ‘Akshars’ that need touching the tongue to teeth are all grouped together and so also those where tongue touches palate and so on, again these are divided on the basis of how much air is required for speaking. In sequence, these categories are: velar, palatal, retroflex, dental, labial, sonorant and fricative. Among the first five groups, the ordering starts with the unaspirated voiceless, then goes on through aspirated voiceless, unaspirated voiced, and aspirated voiced, ending with the Nasal.

(Following 2 tables reproduced from Wikipedia)

Voiced
Aspirated
Unaspirated
Aspirated
ka
kha
kʰə
ga
ɡə
gha
ɡʱə
ṅa
ŋə
cha
tʃə
chha
tʃʰə
ja
dʒə
jha
dʒʱə
ña
ɲə
ya
śha
ʃə
ṭa
ʈə
ṭha
ʈʰə
ḍa
ɖə
ḍha
ɖʱə
ṇa
ɳə
ra
ɾə
ṣa
ta
t̪ə
tha
t̪ʰə
da
d̪ə
dha
d̪ʱə
na
la
sa
pa
pha
pʰə
ba
bha
bʱə
ma
va
ʋə

 

ha
ɦə
Retroflex
ḷa
ɭə
ક્ષ
kṣa
kʃə
જ્ઞ
jña
ɡnə

 

Another unique aspect of mother-language, Sanskrit is that, its every ‘akshar’ and every joined or ‘combo’ ‘akshar’ has a meaning and can be assembled together to make new words. As an example ‘akshar’ ’ means ‘Birth’ and ‘’ means ‘Donate’. (You will see parallel between जन्म (janma) and ‘genesis’, जनन्  (Janan) and ‘genatics’, दानम् (danam) to ‘donation’)

Above table translated into Gujarati:

સ્પર્શ
અનુનાસિક
અંત:સ્થ
ઉષ્માન્
અઘોષ
ઘોષ
અલ્પપ્રાણ
મહાપ્રાણ
અલ્પપ્રાણ
મહાપ્રાણ
કંઠ્ય
khə
ɡə
ɡɦə
ŋə
તાલવ્ય
tʃə
hə
dʒə
ɦə
ɲə
ʃə
મૂર્ધન્ય
ʈə
ʈhə
ɖə
ɖɦə
ɳə
ɾə
દંત્ય
t̪ə
hə
d̪ə
ɦə
ઓષ્ઠ્ય
phə
bɦə
ʋə

 

કંઠસ્થાનીય
ha
ɦə
મૂર્ધન્ય
ɭə
ક્ષ
kʃə
જ્ઞ
jña
ɡnə

Sanskrit and other Indian languages have another unique characteristic. They have several synonym words for the same entity but rarely interchangeable by other as each word conveys specific context or attribute.

Moon, चंद्र, शशांक, ईन्दु, etc.

Water, जल, पानी, निर, etc.

Sun, आदित्य, भास्कर, रवि, सुर्य, etc.

Sanskrit is an ancient language. World’s first known literary records (Rig-Veda) were written in that language. Over period of several millennia, a lot of rich literature is produced in Sanskrit language. Literature includes epics such as Mahabharata and Ramayana, Vedas and Upanishads, Raghuvansh, Harivansh, Shakuntal, Meghdoot, and thousands of other volumes were created by legendary authors such as Vyas, Valmiki, Kalidas, Harsh Vardhan, etc.

Do not be surprised when you look up Merriam Webster Dictionary, at http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sanskrit?show=0&t=1394686779  and it shows, etymology of the word ‘Sanskrit’ as “saṁskṛta, literally, perfected, from sam together + karoti he makes”. (you will see parallel between ‘sam’ and English words ‘sum’ and  ‘krita’ with ‘create’). Sams and Krita words together means ‘Created Perfectly’.  And, truly so, this language leaves us wondering at its extent of perfection. 
What does 'Asanskrit' mean? It is an adjective and literally, it means 'devoid of Sanskrit' but is applied in Sanskrit and Indian languages, to actually mean, 'uncivilized', 'uncultured', 'raw or underdeveloped human'

Thursday, March 20, 2014

Write-Up on the book 'Hindu Temple Management'

Write-Up on the Book: "Hindu Temple Management"

The book is a first-ever systematic presentation on the art of managing Hindu Temples, Maths and Ashrams. Temple Management calls for a unique approach, completely different as compared to what may be required to manage a commercial business, a property or even a charitable institution. A temple manager’s work is more complex than that of any other managers. It is not easy if he wants to run it in a way it should.

A temple manager is expected to be a superman; after all he is the manager of God’s house. He is visualized as a person who is as kind as a kind mother, friendly as a loving brother, strict as a tough father and knowledgeable as a brilliant teacher. He is further required to be a ruthless administrator and a strategist like a Chanakya. All of the above rolled in one! A tall order? Certainly yes. For the temple manager to fit the bill, this book helps provide ideas, milestones, flag posts, warnings and tools. It is expected to enable those temple managers who want to make a success of their temples for the good of the community along with the good of their own self.

Does a temple have any social responsibility? Spiritual responsibility? Any dharmic responsibility? Should it be accountable? What are pitfalls? How are a temple manager and staff to be remunerated? How to use technology and how to still be independent of it? What about the laws of the country? How can a temple engage a community and so also, how can community, in turn, engage with temple? These and many other issues are addressed in this book.

Hinduism by its very nature adapts to the needs of time. Therefore if we find that temples are lacking in some of their ideals today, it is not an insurmountable problem.  It can be overcome with some thoughtful corrections. It should be ensured that these corrections be 100% dharma-compliant and yet reflect modern day realities.

The first chapter gives ideas on how the management of a temple is not similar to managing a business, a property or even a charitable institute; it is much more than those.

The second chapter familiarizes a reader with ideas behind building temples, how are they financed since time immemorial and details of its structure. Also it lists what is expected and what is not expected from a temple. Thus it sets the agenda of what is to come in the next chapters

The third chapter is the longest. It gives overview of temple functions such as administration, maintenance, engagement with community-volunteering, managing pooja rituals etc. and then goes headlong in detailing all the administrative aspects that a temple manager should pay attention to.

Three important subjects are discussed in the fourth chapter; efficient maintenance of the premises, ways of engaging with community and interfaith protocols.

The fifth chapter deals with setting benchmarks for ideal pooja rituals, choosing appropriate stotras, inspirational songs, various pooja requisites and innovative ideas to achieve them.

The sixth chapter draws attention of temple managers towards laws and bylaws governing aspects of running a temple and emphasizes that they need to know local laws governing temples and the community the temples intend to serve. It provides a few legal definitions, allowed and disallowed temple-practices etc.

As end-notes, the book asks 55 teaser questions and provides their short answers that also serve as a quick revision of the book.

What this book does not provide is equally important to understand for the readers. This book does not aim to teach Religious Rituals, Sanskrit Language, Hinduism, Yoga, Meditation or Astrology. These subjects are avoided so as not to dilute message of this book which focuses on the management aspect of temples.
It is hoped that this book will go a long way in improving management of temples. It is recommended that every temple retain a copy. If the temple owners/managers/trustees were to program a reading of this book at least once for the benefit of their staff, it would prepare ground for setting a minimum common denominator for the temples in the art of good-temple-management.The book is hard-bound and has 164 pages (155+ix). It is published by Global Vision Publishing House, New Delhi.

Your local book-store can get it for you or can be purchased by contacting publisher:

Global Vision Publishing House,
F-4, Ist Floor, 'Hari Sadan', 20, Ansari Road, Daryaganj (Near Delhi Book Store), Delhi : 110002 India.
Phone 011-23261581, 23276291, 64694271, 43575199, 43037885 
Mob. 9810644769

Wednesday, March 19, 2014

Sanskriti - Why English word 'culture' does not mean the same as 'Sanskriti' ?


Why English word 'culture' does not mean the same as 'Sanskriti' ? Language Sanskrit gives ‘Sanskriti’. Culture is different from ‘Sanskriti’. Culture can be given by any language. Some cultures do not even have any language.

Someone said, if you lose your Sanskrit language you lose your  ‘Sanskriti’ (संस्कृति). It is not the same as saying if you lose your language you lose your culture. The word ‘Sanskriti’ is derived from the word ‘Sanskrit’. Sanskrit is a rich language in continuous existence for thousands of years. First known written work known to the mankind, the Rig-Veda’, was written in Sanskrit Language. Historians estimate that the ‘Rig-Veda’ was written well over 5,000 years ago, although the text itself is of more antiquity, it was available in the oral  tradition for a much longer period.

Following table shows, how, if you lose one culture, you gain another culture but if you lose Sanskrit, you lose ‘Sanskriti’. It means that you still will have some culture, even if you were to lose when you acquire another language. But if you lose Sanskrit, or Indian languages, you lose your ‘Sanskriti’ - and gain some other culture but not the ‘Sanskriti’.

World Cultures
Translation in respective
Languages
Pronunciation guide in English Language
How it should be said in Indian Language
English culture
English Culture
English Culture
अंग्रेज प्रकृति
German Culture
Deutsch Kultur
Doeitsch Kultur
जर्मन प्रकृति
Japanese Culture
日本文化
Nippon Bunka
जापानी प्रकृति
French Culture
Culture française
Coolture Fransez
फ्रेंच प्रकृति
Arabic Culture
الثقافة العربية
Assafaka Alarabia
अरब प्रकृति
Russian Culture
русская культура 
Russkaya Kul'tura
रुसी प्रकृति
Indian Culture
भारतीय संस्कृति
Bharatiya Sanskriti
भारतीय संस्कृति

Indian languages, including Sanskrit, define ‘Sanskriti’ as the Indian way of life, way of thinking and way of worship as inspired from the Sanskrit language. Thus, ‘Sanskriti’ is a ‘top-down’ approach as compared to ‘culture’, which is most often, a ‘bottom-up’ approach.  Culture, as the word means is an ‘auto-development’ of a society living under certain socio-economic-politico situation, almost the same as developing a bacteria culture in a laboratory. That Growth is culture. To its quite opposite is ‘Sanskriti’ which is a life and society patterned after a hallowed inspiration from the lives of Gods and Devas.

Man is a special variety of life among all living entities. An animal eats when it is hungry and does not eat when not hungry. But a man can voluntarily eat even when he is not hungry and can voluntarily go without eating even when he is hungry. In other words, man can defy nature for meeting his objectives. Ancient Indian sages identified this human ability and they challenged humans by setting higher goals to become better beings. That needs voluntary sacrifices, curtailing leisure, beating natural forces of cold, heat, gravity, etc. He was prodded to live for a goal and not succumb to growing like bacterial culture under given situation, rather, create a situation. Development that follows thus, guided by Sanskrit, the language of Gods, is ‘Sanskriti’ and it is essentially top-down, as compared to ‘culture’ which is essentially, bottom-up.

If 'culture' is not ‘Sanskriti’, than, what is the equivalent word for ‘culture’ in Indian languages? Let us examine: What is not Sanskrit is ‘non-Sanskrit’ or ‘Asanskrit’ (असंस्कृत). In Sanskrit literature, the word ‘Asanskrit’ denotes ‘uncivilized’, ‘savage’ ‘uncultured’ etc. However, for those who have developed automatically through natural (प्राकृतिक) process are known as ‘Praakrit’ (प्राकृत), ‘developed naturally as organic growth’. Thus, what is not ‘Sanskrit’ is ‘Praakrit’. It follows therefore that what is not “Sanskriti’ (संस्कृति) is ‘Prakriti (प्रकृति). Indians have been naïve in translating their ‘Sanskriti’ as culture and other’s ‘culture’ as ‘Sanskriti’. It is similar to translation mishap naïve Indians did a few centuries ago, calling religions of non-Hindus as ‘Dharma’. As, Hinduism is not only a religion but ‘dharma’ and the rest, religions but not ‘dharma’, the Indian way of life, the way of thinking and the way of worship is not just culture but ‘Sanskriti’ and the rest is ‘culture’ or ‘Praakrit’. Mis-translation has occurred because; early Indians did not undertake a proper ‘पूर्व-पक्ष’ (‘Purva-Paksha the study of culture of others) when they came in contact of alien cultures. Blame should go to their innocence, naivety and perhaps lack of foresight that they ignored to learn way of life of alien cultures before assigning grand terms of Sanskrit language to other entities.

Apart from these, three words ‘Sanskriti’, ‘Praakrit’ and ‘Dharma’, there are hundreds of other words, wrongly translated and do injustice to India, Indians and Sanskrit language.
 

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Genomes link aboriginal Australians to Indians

Mingling of genes four millennia ago suggests continent was not isolated after all

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/science/Genes-link-Australia-with-India-Indians-broke-Australian-isolation-study-says/articleshow/18029070.cms











People from the Indian sub-continent migrated to Australia and mixed with Aborigines 4,000 years ago, bringing the dingo dog with them, according to a study published on Tuesday.



The continent was thought to have been isolated from other populations until Europeans landed at the end of the 1700s.

But researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, reported "evidence of substantial gene flow between Indian populations and Australia about 4,000 years ago".

They analysed genetic variation from across the genome from Australian Aborigines, New Guineans, Southeast Asians, and Indians.

"Long before Europeans settled in Australia humans had migrated from the Indian subcontinent to Australia and mixed with Australian Aborigines," the study said.

It found "substantial gene flow from India to Australia 4,230 years ago ie... well before European contact," it said.

"Interestingly," said researcher Irina Pugach, "this date also coincides with many changes in the archaeological record of Australia, which include a sudden change in plant processing and stone tool technologies... and the first appearance of the dingo in the fossil record.

"Since we detect inflow of genes from India into Australia at around the same time, it is likely that these changes were related to this migration," she said.

A common origin was also discovered for the Australian, New Guinean and Philippine Mamanwa populations who had followed a southern migration route out of Africa begun more than 40,000 years ago.

The researchers estimate the groups split about 36,000 years ago.

Australia offers some of the earliest archaeological evidence for the presence of humans outside Africa, with sites dated to at least 45,000 years ago.

Monday, January 30, 2012

“Talisman, sacred cities, secret faith” a book written by Graham Hancock and Robert Bauval




The theme of the book is to establish existence of mysterious link between the designs of European and American-mega cities such as re-built Paris, post-great fire London and specially-built Washington DC and the ancient cities of Luxor, Rome, Heliopolis, Alexandria and Karnak. The author, Robert Bauval, being a structural engineer, the book is developed as a delightful resource for architectural history of otherwise invisible Egyptian link beyond the obvious iconography. Could anyone imagine, deliberate use of very unchristian, very heathen, customs and rituals of ancient Egypt by Christian and secular countries of America and Europe at the key monuments in those cities? Why was it done? The book provide eye-opener episodes from dark pages of history when people of Europe faced brutal repressions from the Church and clergy. After the state protection provided in AD 312 by Constantine, there was no looking back. Corrupted by power, wealth and ambition, the Church inflicted unspeakable tortures for last almost 2000 years, resulting in deaths of over a million good people, thinkers, scientists, writers artists and pious missionaries. The book connects many 'heretics' and intellectuals, Cathars, Messalians, Bogomils, Templar Knights, Magis, Manicheans, Lutheran Protestants, Freemasons and intellectuals such as Voltaire, Rousseau, Francis Bacon, Cromwell, Giordano Bruno, Tommaso Campanella,George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Roosevelt, Mitterrand, etc.

Book can said to have begun at the Place de la Concorde in Paris where the author, Robert, was looking at the Egyptian obelisk and wondered to himself: “how strangely forlorn it (obelisk) looked, away from its original home at Luxor in Upper Egypt. It was, as far as I knew, the oldest monument in Paris, dating from the reign of Rameses II, c. 1260 BC. It was one of a pair, the other still standing outside the Luxor temple. I realized that I knew virtually nothing about why and how it was brought here to Paris.” One curiosity led him to many more. And ultimately over a period of many years of research, it yielded this book.

Some reviewers think that the book is speculative and that the book does not contain anything 'new'. This could be a view of Church because they knew everything. They had skillfully kept many things away from public's gaze. However, from the references provided and the intensive research carried out by both authors, to me it is not as speculative as what those reviewers want us to believe, rather it has a lot of substance and it neatly concludes architectural links. While successfully establishing the existence of the invisible but continuous thread extending from the era that has gone by to the present, what authors have more significantly pointed towards is the continued existence, throughout the Christian history, till today, of those factions, groups and people who although dearly loved Jesus, would not like to accept writ of Church. For them Church was unholy, an 'imposter' and usurper of Jesus. For them, Pope was “devil's representative on earth”.More learned among these 'heretics' lived a frugal life, were celibates, ate strictly vegetarian diet and spent their time on God contemplation. They chose to live in voluntary poverty. And yet they and their relatives were hunted, tortured, burned, decapitated and all their worldly belongings confiscated. The Church had unleashed an era of 'informer culture', 'heresy-hunting', moral corruption, political power of Church and deadly inquisitions. That rebellious link however still persists, and still performs mysterious pagan rituals, if we are to believe the authors. Fortunately some of the documents that Church wanted destroyed had survived to see the light of the day. When the 'Nag Hammadi Library' was discovered in Egypt in 1945 and they give out clear message of the existence of 'secret society' as a resistance group.

It is clear that Church erred, grossly erred, by their later date reinstating most of those who were punished and admitting Popes having committed excesses under 'pressure'.

Authors have uncovered mystery behind the deliberate use of ancient religious rituals involving Sun, Osiris, Isis, Sirius, Pyramids and the use of elements from the temple of Solomon and in general a host of 'pagan' things from Hellenistic and Mesopotamia cultures.

The canvass of the Authors is huge, it begins from prehistoric Pharaoh times and moves to Hermes, Moses, Plato, Aristotle, Alexander Ptolemy, Darius Julius Caesar, Charlemagne, French Kings, Napoleon, Nelson, British Royals, Ben Gurion, Franklin, George Washington and George Bush. It takes in its stride, major European events, Crusades against Islam, Crusades against Christian heresy-mongers and against free thinkers, academics and artists, Rise and fall of Knight Templars, Secretive society of Freemasons, Illuminaty, Rise of Lutheran Protestantism, French revolution, American independence, creation of Israel and 9/11. It covers the territory of America, Europe, north Africa, Middle-East, Byzantine, Mesopotamia, Persia, China and Vietnam.

When authors refer to 'Gentle Christ and brutal Church' I am reminded of a booklet I read a few years back, its title, I thought was curious at that time,“Why Indians Like Jesus but not Church”. Had I read “Talisman, sacred cities, secret faith” beforehand I would not have felt curious. It stands to reason.

'Talisman' is a big book (562 pages), it is a serious reading material and an amazing book, a book I would say, 'must read'

More information on this book can be had from the authors' homepage:

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Unity in Diversity of India


I found it rather curious that all speeches and essays that I happened to see on this subject were talking only about diversity among us and none talked about our unifying factors. It was as if the subject was ‘Diversity in Unity’ instead of ‘Unity in Diversity’. I remembered a BBC documentary, ‘Around the World in 80 Days’[1], first broadcast in 1989 where its presenter, actor Michael Palin, who was astonished at diversities of language, religion, traditions, climates and geography of India, asks this relevant question, “What unites India” to an apparently well educated passenger travelling with him on a first class compartment of a train from Mumbai to Chennai. In its 4th episode of 7-part series, the lady passenger frankly admits, “Oh that really is tough one to answer”.

How come? I thought to myself and then did a little informal research, a ground reality check. Albeit, everyone knew what divide us, how different from each other are we and how we are even opposing each other, the rest of the responses were; ‘this is our country’, ‘we are born here’, ‘we share same constitution without discrimination’, we are united under one flag, etc. More knowledgeable sort of respondents took the unity happily for granted and enlightened me on agencies that were, in their opinion, responsible for our unity. The ‘nationhood’ ‘created’ by British and their network of railways and postal services. If those were to be the uniting agencies, I thought to myself, the colonial ‘Indians’ would never have asked for splitting what was then India on religious lines. History has in fact recorded that British divided us as never before.

Even if we credit Britain to have presented Indian nation as a politically united entity to us, we should remember that it was our current map minus 562 princely states and the huge landmasses that went to make Pakistan and Bangladesh. The Princely states between them controlled 40% of the liberated Indian Territory. It was thanks to Saradar Vallabh Bhai Patel that we have India as it looks on the map today after he integrated those states into then India. And if religion really can unite a country, we need to consider if it did by looking at bloody separation of Bangladesh from Pakistan and, 8 years of war between Iran and Iraq and general sense of distrust among members of 56 OIC[2] countries.

What is a nation? It is a political entity governed by a single agency; be it a political party, a king or a dictator. However we know that population living under one single administration does not always feel one. The erstwhile USSR, a formidable country, a powerful administration – world’s largest, broke up into 15 independent nations whose populations hardly share any common vision today, even if they had excellent railway and postal network. Similar alienations became manifest when several countries split up, for instance, Serbia, Bosnia and Croatia, North and South Sudan etc. Synthetic unity is brittle. On the other hand the German population that lived under two separate and opposing administrations - GDR (East Germany) and FRG (West Germany) culturally felt united and did unite in the end as one Germany in Oct 1990. So also did North and South Vietnams. Currently we see that China and Taiwan are culturally similar but share opposing administrations. To a great extent this is true also for us and our neighbors. The bonhomie seen between citizens of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan and Nepal is not really surprising. Especially when meeting on foreign soil such as in Gulf, Africa, Europe or USA, these citizens (or ex-citizens) have formed natural bonds, irrespective of religions followed by them.

In South Asia, even before the occupation by foreign invaders (Afghan, Uzbek, Turk, Mongol, Iraqi, Iranian, Portuguese, French and British), even though we were split among hundreds of kingdoms we did feel a sense of unity. If neither their administration, nor religion, language, or railways and postal network have provided, is there that something deeper rooted in the Indian minds that give them a sense of unity?

The fact that (present day) India was split between many kingdoms in the pre-colonial era and yet the whole mass of South Asia was known by one common name from early prehistory is unique for any country. Arabs called our part of the world as ‘Hind’ despite us sharing several rulers. The name ‘India’ was derived by Europeans from the Arabic ‘Hind’. Herodotus (484-425 BC), a Greek historian, wrote about our wealth and non-violent habits and called us Indians. Another Greek, Megasthenes (302-298 BC) who was appointed as an Ambassador[3] to the court of Chandragupta Maurya gave name to what chronicle he wrote as “Indica”, an authentic source for historians to gauge what Greeks thought of Indians at that time. Among many things, he wrote[4]: “No Indian ever went outside his own country on a warlike expedition, so righteous were they." Also that, "Indians do not put up memorials to the dead; but they regard their virtues as sufficient memorials for the departed, and the songs which they sing at their funerals." And "This also is remarkable in India; that all Indians are free, and no Indian at all is a slave”. We share sense of one overarching Indian nation from ancient times. We share together tributes paid to us by historians and visitors.

In other parts of the world, diversity is not easily tolerated. They are afraid of difference[5]. We Indians proudly celebrate our plurality without apology. We take pride in our ‘unity in diversity’, the heterogeneity.  We do not seem to tire out listing our diversities, the religions, the languages, the gods, the castes, the climates, the customs, the attires, the cuisines, the dances, the ceremonies, the festivals etc. We have diverse opinions on each and every subject, aptly proving the Sanskrit proverb “Tunde, Tunde Matirbhinna”- in English it would mean that opinions differ with every head. Uncannily, our politics provide ample proof of this compulsive differing. In most other countries, two or three political parties would suffice but not in India - here we have 58[6] parties, and hundreds of independent members who can not find any of the available political party with who their opinions match. Especially our this trait, agree to disagree, was so striking that when Prof. Amartya Sen, a left leaning Nobel laureate sat to write down the differences and when he dived into our history and ancient literatures to find its evidence, he could easily come up with so overwhelming a quantum of episodes that he could devote an entire volume to listing differences Indians had among themselves from the time immemorial, yes I mean his book: “The Argumentative Indian”.

‘Agree to disagree’ is no laughing matter; it is actually the matter that unites us. We are unique in the world in the sense that we do give a formidable resistance to anyone who tries to dictate our minds. In other parts of the world, captains of the industry through their advertisements and lobbying, religious leaders through their institutions and fatawas, and, rulers through their official and unofficial machinery control the opinions of people. In India too this happens, however, people do not get overly swayed by ‘leaders’. An Indian, rich or poor, religious or otherwise, political or apolitical, listens to every one of them, even somewhat follows them but always keeps his own mind open and does a fair analysis ultimately. He can not be fooled for too long. Should not a man worth his salt have his own individual opinion? Borne out of own personal evaluation, assessments and verification? Actually, this ability to think independently is the core behind the plurality that we celebrate and a leading virtue that gave us indisputable edge in the IT[7]. We ask questions that others dare not. It is not a coincidence that not even one suicide bomber has emerged from India during decades of global terrorism, nor it is a coincidence that those MNCs[8] that once dreamt of sweeping Indian markets with their pizzas, fried-chicken, ice-creams, coffees and colas found going a bit difficult. We simply refuse to be shepherded as lambs.

Well, that the differences do exist is more or less obvious; I wish someone was now to write as interesting a volume on the factors that unite us by going behind the obvious. This is more important to any nation. What are the uniting factors and what are those nuts and bolts which keep us united?  Not that the information is not available, it is just that those factors are not emphasized enough and therefore have escaped making impression. Perhaps it is time we talk more about the ‘factors behind unity’. Why do we feel we are ‘one’ despite so many obvious differences? What generates the sense of oneness despite barriers?

One thing that strikes most to us and to foreigners alike is that we are an ancient country. Ancientness is our first uniting factor. True this is even for China, Egypt, Greece, Iraq, Iran, Mexico etc that all had thriving civilizations in distant past. However what distinctly separates us from them is that our ancient culture is a living culture even now. In India, we have modern and ancient traditions existing side by side. We live by tenets of ‘maatru devo bhava, pitru devo bhava, aacharya devo bhava, atithi devo bhava, swaadhyaayanmaa pramadah, shraddhaaya deyam” (See God in mother, father, teacher and guest. Introspect regularly without being lazy, help others in good faith) that were formulated thousands of year ago and yet enjoy latest discoveries in sciences without slightest sense of conflict. Ancient Gods and their stories, Ra or Horus in Egypt, Jupiter in Rome, Zeus in Greece, Itzamna in Mexico, Viracocha in South America and Odin in Northern Europe have lost their sway a long ago on their peoples, they are no more their Gods. But in India, Raam and Krishna continue to sway millions of us, religious or otherwise. Huge temples of Jupiter in Rome and Baalbek are nothing more than ruins. No one worships there. In India, the ancient temples are still busy centers of worship. No corner of India is without signature of our common ancient heritage.

For us India is motherland, we have lived off its food, water and air, we have formed our mind and ideas here, we are educated here, we have earned here, we have friends and relatives here, so if we say “Vande Mataram” or “Maa Tujhe Salaam”, it is probably easy and natural. However, believe you me, our these very feelings of shared inheritance are intensely shared by millions of Indians living overseas, some of whom may not even have seen India and some of them may be holding foreign passports. An incredibly large number of foreigners, white, black, yellow and brown, love India and her people. It is the sense of oneness that counts. What our forefathers have asked from us, “to look at the people of the whole world as one family”, is not an admirable self-target? We as Indians are united in sharing this ideal handed down to us.

Our forefathers have made great effort to instill the love of land by their prose, poetry and rituals. In certain ceremonies[9] soil of India is revered and its pinch is placed on head to honor it. All rivers of India are held sacred and especially River Ganga is so highly revered that in the millions of homes across the country they permanently store at least a few drops of its water for use during sacred rituals, birth or death. Reverence for the twelve Jyotirlingas spread across four corners of India, seven sacred cities, holy lakes, wells and mountains etc are kept in collective consciousness of Indians by several hymns, songs, rituals and images. They have held every square meter of India sacred. If Rabindranath Tagore reminds us of our provinces, rivers and mountains in the national anthem, “Jana Gana Mana…” it is done even more intensely in the hymns of our ancient rishis. Their songs, even after thousands of years and even without any official endorsement have remained in our hearts and on our tongues.

Its result is for everyone to see in terms of religious tourism. From time immemorial, without any advertisements, without ‘tourism promotion councils’ and without any charity from wealthy or subsidy by governments,  people-old and young, men, women and children- crisscrossed India in a vast zigzag. During war and peace and during unsettled times of middle ages too, the pilgrimage continued unabated. The world is amazed that without needing any invitation or announcement, the millions of people have been gathering for Kumbha festival from several thousands of years, since the days of ‘great churning of milky ocean’. To say that it is extraordinary would be an understatement. Besides thousands of pilgrimage destinations, India is blessed with thousands of other touristic places that we enjoy in India, the beaches, mountain resorts, lakes, wildlife sanctuaries, adventure sports, etc spread across length and breadth of this big country, 7th largest in the world having an area of about 3 million square km and a population of 1 billion. We are united in feeling awe for age old and still going strong spiritual pilgrimage that gives rise to better integration by exchange of culture between far flung places. To further enhance integration, scriptural authority provides that no other but a Malayalee of southern India only can be appointed as a priest at several temples of the northern India such as Kedarnath and Badrinath and apply rituals specified in the Krishna-Yajurved developed in western India while seating looking at east.

India is emerging from the shadows of poverty, strife and plunders left behind by colonial rulers, foreign invaders and even corrupt local rulers. In a short span of 65 years as an independent nation, it has made a great progress. We have lifted millions from the poverty threshold, our businessmen have launched global corporations, our CEOs, CFOs, technocrats and scientists run hundreds of global entities. Our education counts and our students obtain best ranks and jobs anywhere they go. A recently published survey showed that the average Indian family income is highest among US population. From the margins, we now occupy seat at G20 summit. World leaders expect us to bail out some of the bankrupt nations or help them fight the menace of terrorism and despot rulers. In short Indians in India and even overseas have succeeded despite very modest restart in 1947 virtually without any godfather in this ruthless world at large. It is our mind, evolved from wisdom of centuries, ripened and honed, is our common heritage. It was a wealthy and culturally rich beacon like India that lured the world in past. Even after endless loot, plunder and cruelty it suffered, today it is once again ready to give. Always a giver of wealth, physical, intellectual or spiritual, with that mother India I feel united, be me here, there or anywhere in the world. Yes, there is much diversity, it adds to our richness but also we have deep rooted factors of unity which keep us together-with pride.

An American[10] national security adviser famously stated in her March 2000 speech that “enemy unites us”. If only an enemy was to unite, every nation would have to create and keep creating enemies. Indians are different; we do not need an enemy to become united. With or without, we are united. In diversity we are united, we are fortunate; we have hundreds of reasons to feel united and stay united.



[1] This BBC serial was inspired by classic science fiction “Around the world in 80 days” written by French author Jules Verne in 1873.
[2] Organization of Islamic Conference. http://www.oic-oci.org/
[3] ambassador of the Greek general Seleucus Nicator
[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indica_(Arrian)
[5] Refer to “Being different”, a book by Rajiv Malhotra,
[6] As per the latest figures available with Election Commission of India, there are a total of 1,197 registered political parties in India. Of these, 6 national level parties and 52 state level parties (Collectively 58) are registered & recognized by EC and are allotted symbols. Rest 1,139 political parties are registered by EC but have not been allotted symbol. Ref. government of India website: http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/ElectoralLaws/OrdersNotifications/Notification_symbol_08032011.pdf
[7] Information Technology
[8] Multi-national corporations
[9] Ceremony of Upaveet or holy thread
[10] Condoleezza Rice