There are five main reasons: 1) Greek and Roman legends
depict their mythological Gods as egoist, jealous and partial. The Testament
(Both new and old) clearly state in Ten Commandments that ‘I am a jealous God’.
Thus, a large population familiar with Western literature expect God to be
jealous and therefore do not see anything wrong in the Onam story. (those well
versed in Hindu Sanskriti, know that God is never jealous. He is always fair
and impartial) 2) In the Puraans, some of the stories related to Indra Deva
does show that he gets jealous and scared of those who are powerful and
virtuous lest they claim Indraasan. However, be careful, Indra is not a God; he
is a person, of extra-ordinary caliber, appointed by Gods as ‘Indra’ to look
after functioning and balancing of natural elements and forces. Not dissimilar
to an executive who is appointed by a business owner. Indra is the title of the
executive who occupies seat, the Indraasan. Every executive needs to take care
of his seat in order to do full justice to his task and not waste away his
investment of time and energy at the job. Therefore, it is not unnatural if an
executive feels a little possessive about his seat, often it is for securing
better future of business he is asked to run. Just as in any business, the
appointee who initially appears capable, may prove himself to be unfit for the
job, so has it happened even in the administration of heaven. Ancient Hindu
Sanskriti is witness to sackings and appointments of candidates on the
Indraasan. Puraanic history tells us that God sacked Nahush from the position
of Indra and replaced him with Purandhar as the new Indra. An unsuitable man
can destroy years of good work of previous executive, so if Indra defends his
Indraasan, it is understandable. 3) All those forces who would like to show
Hinduism in poor light would be happy to perpetuate the story of ‘unfairness of
Hindu Gods’ to show that their ism is better than Hinduism. They uncritically
hails Bali and preach, if not hatred, dislike for Indra Deva, Vishnu Bhagavaan,
Bhagavaan Vaaman et al. 4) Many Hindus are naïve or uninformed about their
Sanskriti heritage. They do not know that most translations of ancient Sanskrit
books into English was done by those who were not India’s best friends, that
English language does not have proper equivalents of Sanskrit words and that
current uninformed writers have copied and recopied their work from erroneous
material. Thus, what we are reading is an erroneous triple-distillated material
that smacks of a demagogue portraying a partisan, unfair or jealous God. 5)
Onam story is more significant to Malayalees due to Mahaa Bali’s association
with the state of Kerala. Since independence, for last 6 decades, communists
and left of center socialists parties are running the government of Kerala, who
prefer as state policy, the freebie model of governance. They are therefore natural
proponents of ‘freebie’ story.
For 1-Page format of all 5-parts story, click: http://nmsresolution.blogspot.ca/2014/05/onam-maha-bali-vaman-vaman-jayanti-1.html
No comments:
Post a Comment